Ads by Google

Friday, June 17, 2016

Accounting for Share-Based Payment

Photo owned by www.ifrsbox.com


Definition

A share-based payment is a transaction in which the entity receives or acquires goods or services either as consideration for its equity instruments or by incurring liabilities for amounts based on the price of the entity's shares or other equity instruments of the entity.

Types of share-based payment transactions

(a) equity-settled share-based payment transactions, in which the entity receives goods or services as consideration for equity instruments of the entity (including shares or share options)
(b) cash-settled share-based payment transactions, in which the entity acquires goods or services by incurring liabilities to the supplier of those goods or services for amounts that are based on the price (or value) of the entity's shares or other equity instruments of the entity, and
(c) cash or equity settled share-based payment transactions, in which the entity receives or acquires goods or services and the terms of the arrangement provide either the entity or the supplier of those goods or services with a choice of whether the entity settles the transactions in cash (or other assets) or by issuing equity instruments.

Recognition and Measurement

The issuance of shares or rights to shares requires an increase in a component of equity. PFRS 2 requires the offsetting debit entry to be expensed when the payment for goods or services are consumed. For example, the issuance of shares or rights to shares to purchase inventory would be presented as an increase in inventory and would be expensed only once the inventory is sold or impaired.

The issuance of fully-vested shares, or rights to shares, is presumed to relate to past service, requiring the full amount of the grant date fair value to be expensed immediately. The issuance of shares to employees with, say, a three-year vesting period is considered to relate to services over the vesting period. Therefore, the fair value of the share-based payment, determined at the grant date, should be expensed over the vesting period.

As a general principle, the total expense related to equity-settled share-based payments will equal the multiple of the total instruments that vest and the grant-date fair value of those instruments. In short, there is truing up to reflect what happens during the vesting period. However, if the equity-settled share-based payment has a market related performance feature, the expense would still be recognized if all other vesting features are met.


Measurement Guidance

Depending on the type of share-based payment, fair value may be determined by the value of the shares or rights to shares given up, or by the value of the goods or services received:

1. General fair value measurement principle. In principle, transactions in which goods or services are received as consideration for equity instruments of the entity should be measured at the fair value of the goods or services received. Only if the fair value of the goods or services cannot be measured reliably would the fair value of the equity instruments granted be used.

2. Measuring employee share options. For transactions with employees and others providing similar services, the entity is required to measure the fair value of the equity instruments granted, because it is typically not possible to estimate reliably the fair value of employee services received.

3. When to measure fair value-options. For transactions measured at the fair value of the equity instruments granted (such as transactions with employees), fair value should be estimated at grant date.

4. When to measure fair value - goods and services. For transactions measured at the fair value of the goods or services received, fair value should be estimated at the date of receipt of those goods or services.

5. Measurement guidance. For goods or services measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments granted, PFRS 2 specifies that, in general, vesting conditions are not taken into account when estimating the fair value of the shares or options at the relevant measurement date (as specified above). Instead, vesting conditions are taken into account by adjusting the number of equity instruments included in the measurement of the transaction amount so that, ultimately, the amount recognized for goods or services received as consideration for the equity instruments granted is based on the number of equity instruments that eventually vest.

6. More measurement guidance. PFRS 2 requires the fair value of equity instruments granted to be based on market prices, if available and to take into account the terms and conditions upon which those equity instruments were granted. In the absence of market prices, fair value is estimated using a valuation technique to estimate what the price of those equity instruments would have been on the measurement date in an arm's length transactions between knowledgeable, willing parties. The standard does not specify which particular model should be used.

7. If fair value cannot be reliably measured. PFRS 2 requires the share-based payment transaction to be measured at fair value for both listed and unlisted entities. PFRS 2 permits the use of intrinsic value (that is, fair value of the shares less exercise price) in those "rare cases" in which the fair value of the equity instruments cannot be reliably measured. However this is not simply measured at the date of grant. An entity would have to remeasure intrinsic value at each reporting date until final settlement.

8. Performance conditions. PFRS 2 makes a distinction between the handling of market based performance features from non-market features. Market conditions are those related to the market price of an entity's equity, such as achieving a specified share price or a specified target based on a comparison of the entity's share price with an index of share prices of other entities. Market-based performance features should be included in the grant-date fair value measurement. However, the fair value of the equity instruments should not be reduced to take into consideration non-market based performance features or other vesting features.

Modifications, Cancellations, and Settlements

The determination of whether a change in terms and conditions has an effect on the amount recognized depends on whether the fair value of the new instruments is greater than the fair value of the original instruments (both determined at the modification date).

Modification of the terms on which equity instruments were granted may have an effect on the expense that will be recorded. PFRS 2 clarifies that the guidance on modifications also applies to instruments modified after their vesting date. If the fair value of the new instruments is more than the fair value of the old instruments (e.g., by reduction of the exercise price or issuance of  additional instruments), the incremental amount is recognized over the remaining vesting period in a manner similar to the original amount. If the modification occurs after the vesting period, the incremental amount is recognized immediately. If the fair value of the new instruments is less than the fair value of the old instruments, the original fair value of the equity instruments granted should be expensed as if the modification never occurred.

The cancellation or settlement of equity instruments is accounted for as an acceleration of the vesting period and therefore any amount unrecognized that would otherwise have been charged should be recognized immediately. Any payments made with the cancellation or settlement (up to the fair value of the equity instruments) should be accounted for as the repurchase of an equity interest. Any payment in excess of the fair value of the equity instruments granted is recognized as an expense.

New equity instruments granted may be identified as a replacement of cancelled equity instruments. In those cases, the replacement equity instruments should be accounted for as a modification. The fair value of the replacement equity instruments is determined at grant date, while the fair value of the cancelled instruments is determined at the date of cancellation, less any cash payments on cancellation that is accounted for as a deduction from equity.

Copyright @philcpareview

3 comments:

  1. Nice blog!! This blog is really an academic standard blog which helps thousands of students worldwide. I have also started a blog on Business,Accounting and Finance for academia purpose. I hope my blog will also serve your vision.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I certainly agree to some points that you have discussed on this post. I appreciate that you have shared some reliable tips on this review.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The information on this topic is really one particular of the most effective
    substance that We have actually appear throughout. I adore your publish thanks a lot.

    payroll services new jersey
    Cpa Consulting in new jersey

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...